The judge accepts expert expressions in the TCB case against Ginnie Mae

At the beginning of this month, government lawyers protested against the record report on the claim that the report was not “revising the requirement of judiciary”, “the court demanding the consent of the TCB”.

But the ruling Matthew Kacmaryk The US District Court in the northern district did not agree with the government's result. Taking into account the legal questions of the issue provided by the issue, the issue will allow the judgment of the mortgage industry to the court, “he said.

The judge continued the existing record to be eligible for such a statement that will not be appropriate or appropriate. Based on the precedent, Kacmararyk did the same, even without demonstrating the relevant terms of the party who want to add a record.

According to him, such a campaign is generally allowed to help determine the “background information” is considered by all relevant factors. Additional information is allowed. The information from Conway falls into this category, the judge prevails.

“The expert report contains all the information of the administrative record, the expert report is in a format to help the concept of the court,” Kacmararyk wrote. If legal statements are not included, the data can “add the perspective on how legal interpretations affect the basic facts of the work.”

In court to submit a CONWAY report, Texas Capital Bank “'affected tails,' Like those who are the issue, 'it differs from the pool mortgage loans and is not a derivative of the pool of mortgage.”

“CONWAY), TCB's tail financing, and TCB's Ginnie Mae's TCB's abuse of TCB is discussing how TCB's tail finances are.”

The Bank claimed that the report was considered in a court before a decision of the Government in TCB last month.

This motion remains above, but the government, Kajmarryk's Ginnie Mae's RMF's extinguishment and cancellation of RMF (the mortgage portfolio has claimed to have the owner of the mortgage portfolio and (the absolute property of the mortgage portfolio.

They also said that the TCB “has no residue or interests in the property given in this case.” The October authority proves “the death toll in the remaining two remaining number of TCB” and gave the right to make a summary of Ginnie Mae.

TCB, for the summary of the government, TCB will allow TCB to test the assets of TCB in TCB without allowing TCB to the TCB.

It was claimed in the center of these measures. Ginnie Mae's original complaint, the TCB, allegedly, in exchange for any consideration, Hundreds of millions of dollars (FHA) -S-insonyor (HECM) program with the first priority of TCB. “

This is the bank's teacher, after applying to the TCB to help prevent a disastrous violation of the Ginnie Mae.

The bank took steps and in exchange for bankruptcy in exchange for bankruptcy, the TCB for borrowing borrowed in exchange for the loan, he received the first priority of this “on a certain healet”. TCB said it was “critical important,” he was the only hostage he could trust a subtle company.